33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives with the police is always to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and earlier mentioned all, assure regulation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair towards the offender and also the Magistracy is to guarantee a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court along with from other Courts, Nevertheless they have did not have any corrective effect on it.
Article 199 in the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other suitable remedy is provided by legislation." It truly is very well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust readily available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether All those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
If your DIGP finds evidence of a cognizable offense by either party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and move forward according on the law. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Read more
The ruling with the first court created case law that must be accompanied by other courts until finally or Except possibly new regulation is created, or perhaps a higher court rules differently.
Therefore, this petition is found to generally be not maintainable and is dismissed along with the pending application(s), along with the petitioners may well search for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
Generally speaking, higher courts never have direct oversight over the decreased courts of record, in that they cannot get to out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments on the reduced courts.
When the state court hearing the case reviews the regulation, he finds that, though it mentions large multi-tenant properties in certain context, it's actually very obscure about whether the ninety-day provision applies to all landlords. The judge, based around the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held to your ninety-working day notice need, and rules in Stacy’s favor.
168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh here Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Subject matter: Appeal At times it truly is handy for your Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to produce an attempt to eliminate a case on merit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's reached into a stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for advantage disposal when it has achieved this kind of stage. Read more
10. Without touching the merits with the case from the issue of once-a-year increases in the pensionary emoluments in the petitioner, in terms of policy decision of your provincial government, this sort of yearly increase, if permissible while in the case of employees of KMC, needs further assessment to generally be made from the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance resulting from funding issues and lack of adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, requiring the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more
Do you think you're looking for Court Information? You can use our site to search for any case or search for your person. Information within the site is updated every 24 several hours at three:00 am. Please Note: Name and Case information found on the search site is provided for use as reference material and isn't the official court record.
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance of the respondents that pensionary benefits may very well be withheld on account on the allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section 20 of your Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does present for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced. These involve if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension might be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension may be withheld or reduced. In a few cases, a civil servant's pension could be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established from the government.
The different roles of case law in civil and common regulation traditions create differences in just how that courts render decisions. Common legislation courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale guiding their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and often interpret the wider legal principles.
Because of their position between the two main systems of legislation, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as mixed systems of regulation.
Criminal cases During the common legislation tradition, courts decide the law applicable to the case by interpreting statutes and making use of precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. As opposed to most civil regulation systems, common legislation systems follow the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their have previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all decrease courts should make decisions dependable with the previous decisions of higher courts.